I've noticed, here at the AEA convention, that in the seminars in which
enough women are in attendance to actually ascertain a seating
distribution, they sit disproportionately towards the back. And,
since these are usually the same seminars that are full, this is not the same seating distribution as for men.
I was surprised by this since it counters my sexist prior that women tend to be more diligent goody-goodies and therefore more often prefer to sit at the front*. Is this no longer true among women who have selected into the profession of economics? Is it no longer true after a certain age? Why the switch, rather than simply a convergence in seating preference across genders? Is it just because they arrived earlier and took the rear seats, preferred by all? (I doubt that, since the emptier seminars I attended were not fuller at the back at all.) Is it just a fluke?
I was surprised by this since it counters my sexist prior that women tend to be more diligent goody-goodies and therefore more often prefer to sit at the front*. Is this no longer true among women who have selected into the profession of economics? Is it no longer true after a certain age? Why the switch, rather than simply a convergence in seating preference across genders? Is it just because they arrived earlier and took the rear seats, preferred by all? (I doubt that, since the emptier seminars I attended were not fuller at the back at all.) Is it just a fluke?
*which contributes to my typically contrary desire to sit at the back (in addition to
the much stronger factor of wanting to fly under the radar in
general...)

hello. nice blog.^^
ReplyDelete블로그 잘 보고 갑니다